Helmets in Halo 4 that should be changed or scrapped.

Now you may be wondering why I’m bringing this up now instead of shortly after release. Well, I wanted to give the game some time to grow on me as well as gauge reactions fro friends and fans on Halo 4. While most of the opinions in this article are my own, some are also drawn upon and in agreement with those friends and fans.

I’d love to see some of the old armor return. Barring that, I think 343 really needs to take a look at much of the armor they created. Not so much from the neck down, but rather the helmets.

An overwhelming majority of them simply aren’t plausible. How is anyone supposed to see out of some of them? The ones I like the most are the ones with decent sized visors. Operator is great, so too the recruit. But what of Waterworks? Really? A slit in the middle of the helmet for a visor? Also, just the general design of some of these helmets is plain awful. EVA isn’t rounded anymore. And how about the sad face helmet..That’s the HAZOP helmet if you didn’t know. Or the Frankenstein helmet? Seriously, did 343 have any kind of focus group outside of themselves to gauge reaction? (And I’m talking outside of Microsoft altogether.)

As a designer myself as well as a long time Halo gamer, I’d have shot down at least a third of the helmet designs and had them redone or scrapped entirely.

Here are all but I think one of the helmets in Halo 4, with some commentary by me:

A plain “X” means I think it should just be completely removed from any future Halo games.
A “NP” means “not plausible” but could be reworked into a helmet that is plausible to see out of.
A “X” with a “F” next to it means “fugly.” Yeah, you know what that means… How did that design get approved.

(Might I suggest you download this graphic below and open in a new window to make it easier to read along)

halo_4_helmets

Starting at the top, I could have dinged the Gungnir helmet as not plausible, but I gave this one a pass as it was in Reach and very popular as something different. I think however that 343 went just a bit too wild in their designs of helmets for Halo 4. Especially in thinking that we’d like more helmets without plausible visors. Really, what’s the use of visor colors for some fo these helmets when they have none or barely there visors? Anyway, back to the top row. I’m actually fine with them all except while I think the FOTUS helmet (marked “NP” is cool, that horn really should go.
Second row: CIO? More like I can’t see at all. Okay of the offending NP helmets this one has the next to the best potential behind the FOTUS helmet. Change it so that the black area surrounding the three visor dots is also part of the visor and we have a workable helmet that even looks decent. The last one in the row is kind of the same, though that visor would be HUGE.
Third row: Orbital…uh, the mish-mash of Emile’s helmet from Reach, that skull is just horrid. Sorry but I really would have preferred the carved in look. Though yeah, then people would complain about continuity with Emile being dead. So just can this helmet and bring back the traditional EVA helmet. (Which bears noting that the Strider and even to a point the new Rogue helmets are close to the EVA. While I like the Strider one, it and the Rogue one can go in place of a proper EVA helmet.) The helmet next to the Orbital one (forgive me that I can’t recall which one it is) is kinda ungly. Put a visor on it please. Otherwise drop it.
Fourth row: OMG, that Pioneer helmet…It’s a dual vertical Cyclops helmet. Yeah, that’s kind of an oxymoron and there in lies my point, moronic. Make the visor part that strip of metal in the middle and those circles metal instead and maybe, MAYBE you have a viable helmet. Otherwise…yep, CAN IT. Oh the poor Hazop helmet. What happened to you? You now look like a very sad Stormtrooper from Star Wars. Sigh. I liked the Hazop from Reach. Why did 343 have to change it so dramatically? Can this one please and give us something more reminiscent of the Reach Hazop.
Fifth row: Be my Frankenstein! Or at least my weird Halloween helmet. Okay it could also be said to look like a jar, hence jar-head. However I think my marines buddies would take serious offense to that. PLEASE, kill that design. While I think the Locus (why not add that “t” at the end 343?) is very cool looking and even used it for a time, it’s just not plausible since it doesn’t have a visor. Also, consider how bulbous the head is. It looks out of scale with the rest of the body. Fix the scaling at least and keep it in.
Six row: I actually like the Vanguard helmet (the first one), but dang, does it have to have that small square visor? Expand the visor and it would be a great helmet. I do want to unlock this in Halo 4 though as I like the “cross” pattern on it. (that’s the secondary Vanguard helmet which, IIRC is a bit harder to get) Next is the Wetwork helmet. While it’s a cool design in theory and could have been a good replacement for the Hayabusa, that small slit of a visor down the middle just ruins it for me. I’d like to see this reworked with at least a slim banded visor across the middle. Oh the stalker. Okay first, let’s discuss that name. Stalker. Not really something you want to be known as. Yes, I know it was taken from “Brute Stalkers” in previous Halo games. However, some may not make that correlation. It really is a bit creepy. Beyond that though is the stunted, blunted top of the helmet. The visor is just okay. It could definitely have been made bigger and the helmet even shows where that change could have been made.
Seventh row: The Tracker helmet is kind of cool, but the visor is a bit small and low on the helmet. The one thing that does bother me a little is that it constantly reminds me of the Geth head from Mass Effect. The Venator helmet without a doubt is a cool design, but the visor isn’t too plausible. It’s close however. It kind of has the Dead Space feel to it. I think a little bit thicker though on the visor parts would have made this more plausible.

Also, do others think it’s strange that 343 changed the name of some of the helmets from what they were to something else entirely? The Security helmet comes to mind. It’s now the Operator helmet.

Speaking of previous helmets, I’d really like the Mark V, CQB and original Rogue helmets back. I’ve already touched on the EVA coming back as well. Scout looks okay in it’s Halo 4 version as do the EOD helmet.

I just think while wanted to make Halo 4 their own, 343 went a bit too far with some of the helmet designs. Practicality needs to come back. If you’ve read the books then you know that on a rare occasion, the armor fails and they have to use their eyes. Those helmets I listed about as NP would not make the grade. You just can’t remove your helmet in battle. You’d just be begging to be headshot.

Some of the helmets have had such negative review (well and many before my own) that they’ve been dubbed Power Rangers. That’s not really a moniker I want associated with Spartan armor.

Please 343, get back to more practical designs. It can be done, yet still have some splash or “pizazz” to it, without looking otherworldly or alien.

-Sal

This entry was posted in Halo 4 by Sal. Bookmark the permalink.

About Sal

I’ve got tons of experience with Halo gaming and collecting. I feel I have something to offer to the greater Halo fan community. Posts along the way will be about tips and tricks in the games as well as collecting and many more Halo related things. I’ll also repost interesting articles from the official site, Halowaypoint.com, or from fellow Halo fan sites. As I continue this blog, I hope to help gamers who want advice on the games, as well as any collectors with regards to where to find collectibles as well as deals, coupons and so on. You can also follow me on Twitter at: http://twitter.com/#!/HaloFanForLife or Facebook at: http://www.facebook.com/halofanforlife11. Welcome to my blog and I hope you’ll come back again and again. -Sal

18 thoughts on “Helmets in Halo 4 that should be changed or scrapped.

  1. FOTUS is more plausible than some of the other helmets. As an actual helmet it would… Work, just perhaps that horn is a little bit long.

    However, its not really intended to be real. Its like the haunted helmet and flames.

    The other ones however… I agree 100%.

    And im not just saying this because I love my FOTUS.

    • No worries man, I actually really like the FOTUS helmet. Take the horn off and it looks like a Promethean Knight’s head. Well, to me it does.

  2. in my opinion i low all the armor…and i love the changes that they did to the helmets. ex the hazop…..in my opinion i love that try arch visor, and the C.I.O, it is pretty cool having that 3-dot visor. and for my favorite, the locus… yeah it has no visors, but most of theses helmets have visual enhancemants, like a camera or something so they can see better…the only one i don’t like is the eva…they did screw it up. and for the fotus…it won’t be the fotus with out the horn….the fotus armor is suppose to resemble the halo band called fotus that was seen on a poster in the halo 1 campain…they are the unicorn band. so if the removed it, it would be just another new helmet

  3. and most likely you could see out of the CIO since the two top ones are where the eyes are…its like wearing sunglasses…also they all have visual enhancements

  4. also i was never hating i am just expressing my opinion but for i agree that they should remove the skull on the orital helmet but nothin else….that helmet makes me feel like i am a flame marine from halo wars..rember those

  5. lastly for any of the helmets that have the same name, but different design like hazop, hazop has been in the game since the fall of reach “i am talking in chronological order from the halo wars to halo 4″…the design has been there for years…there could have been changes that had been done to it to modify it. like with jets for examples the f-18 has many different variations some have a co pilot others don’t… even with navy ships aircraft carriers they all have the same purposes but they might look different….so from the fall of reach to halo 4 the helmet could have changed over the years, just sayin

    • Visual enhancements would be okay if the armor didn’t fail. We know from the novels that it can fail and has, so they need to be able to see out of their visors without worry if the armor does fail or not. That’s my main concern. Yes, the CIO could be used, but dang those visor dots are pretty small. I’d prefer a fuller field of view, if I had the opportunity. No worries, I wasn’t taking your responses as hating. I would rather people respond. All opinions are welcome so long as they aren’t vulgar or verbally abusive. Yours were neither.

      • yea, lol…..they are spartans…..they adapt pretty quickly…like thorne..he is new, but he ends up being one of the strongest on the team…he survives the teleport from the infinity to reqium, betting up all those elites, and killing one of the higher ranked ones….the elite with out the helmet…he killed him in episode 8 while protecting glass man….so the adapt pretty quickly

  6. Maybe these awful helmets are why nobody on Majestic wears theirs while on duty on the Infinity. To embarrassing, can’t see…

    • Actually, notice that none of them wears a helmet with a slim to none visor. All of theirs have reasonable visors. Thorne:Recruit, Hoya:Operator, Madsen: Recon, DeMarco:Soldier, Grant:Pathfinder All of those are reasonable and at lease plausible to look out of.

  7. also 343 wanted to design helmets that we won’t expect, they wanted something interesting that they thought we would like. in all of halo 3 and reach, most of them where visors that were full like the eva. or some of them were half like th mark 4-6……they wanted something that would be different something that we wouldn’t expect…….come on i didn’t think that they were gonna make a 3-dot visor for the cio, or the try-arch visor on the hazop…the wanted to make it interesting

    • In trying to make it interesting though, they made some very unbelievable and some downright hideous.

  8. lastly the cio has a better view then the gungir helmet…..that visor is tiny

    • True, but I gave that one a pass as it was the first one without much of a visor. One is okay, but the roughly dozen or so 343 implemented? That was too much, IMO.

  9. think of some of those canon wise. the unsc just stumbled on a treasure trove in the world hidden inside onyx. those armors could have some forerunner parts. in them that allow them to have these exotic setups. look how easily we can attach armor abilities in the field from forerunner bodies. its a possibility.

    • Ah now that is a grand theory. I hadn’t thought of that. Finally someone gives me a response that could be plausible for all the exotic armor that is in Halo 4. Thanks!

      • i mean that it might be a little rushed but then again last we heard of Halsey before halo 4 she was on infinity, then suddenly she isn’t. so there may be some time between them. its something i would like to see explored more. hopefully this will come up in the the third Traviss book.

  10. i also had another theory. the CNI or command neural interface can broadcast images to the retinas of the user as of the fall of reach, perhaps by the time of halo 4 the CNI was updated enough to broadcast video so that a helmet does not need to have a visor to be useful. that’s just my idea.

Comments are closed.